--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > Well, I just showed you where I'm getting it from, > > but all of a sudden you're not interested. > > It's more like I don't want to get involved.
You involved yourself when you challenged me. > > If you don't want to have to deal with the evidence > > of who the guy you're so convinced is "all heart" > > really is, that's fine with me. But if that's the > > case, why did you go to the trouble of challenging > > me? > > I wasn't aware that I had challenged you. "I think your analysis here is way wide of the mark, maybe you're projecting most of this, I really don't know how you got into this state but it seems to be a hallmark of your online relationships. Can we admit that? "But Judy, Mean spirited? I think the guy's all heart. Unhappy? A joke, surely. Dishonest? I don't know where you're getting this from. Maybe it all just boils down to the fact he doesn't like you." It's a figure > of speech stemming from the fact I've read Barry's posts > and come to a different conclusion. Did you read the ones I quoted in my current post, along with my responses?
