--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > Well, I just showed you where I'm getting it from, > > > but all of a sudden you're not interested. > > > > It's more like I don't want to get involved. > > You involved yourself when you challenged me. > > > > If you don't want to have to deal with the evidence > > > of who the guy you're so convinced is "all heart" > > > really is, that's fine with me. But if that's the > > > case, why did you go to the trouble of challenging > > > me? > > > > I wasn't aware that I had challenged you. > > "I think your analysis here is way wide of the mark, maybe > you're projecting most of this, I really don't know how you > got into this state but it seems to be a hallmark of your > online relationships. Can we admit that?
Can we? I'm serious, you do seem to rub people up the wrong way. How come I never do that? Well, maybe I do but not too much I hope. > "But Judy, Mean spirited? I think the guy's all heart. Unhappy? > A joke, surely. Dishonest? I don't know where you're getting > this from. Maybe it all just boils down to the fact he doesn't > like you." Ooh, that's not a challenge! It's a fair comment I think. > It's a figure > > of speech stemming from the fact I've read Barry's posts > > and come to a different conclusion. > > Did you read the ones I quoted in my current post, > along with my responses? Yes, but I wasn't impressed. It's all too open to interpretation, did you think it would change my, or anybody's, mind. Just like that? As I say I modify my opinions as new information comes in.
