<(In no way a satiric dig at you.)>

Well, just for the record, satiric digs at me are welcome and
appropriate.  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > I accept that you have had experiences with
> > > > yogis that I haven't had that you value. I do not accept that
> you are
> > > > somehow looking at life in a more profound or special way than I
> am. 
> > > > I appreciate that you are looking at it very differently, which
> is one
> > > > of the things I value in our communication.  My own was just as
> > > > thoughtfully and carefully chosen.
> > > 
> > > Frankly, mine seems much more random and driven by outside
events than
> > >  thoughtfully and carefully chosen -- despite how thoughtful my
plans
> > > are or have been. Power on with your iron will. Thats awesome.
> > 
> > 
> > I'm not claiming an iron anything...well...not my will anyway!  I'm
> > just saying my intellectual position today was thought out, it is not
> > an emotional reaction just as Vaj's adn your's are I presume.
> > 
> > When I left the conceptual model of TM at 31 I realized I had a huge
> > task at hand, to rebuild my epistemology in light of what I considered
> > new information.  With a few friends who shared my journey, I began to
> > fill in some intellectual gaps on POVs on the experiences I had had
> > with Maharishis.  We did our best to bring in as many different POVs
> > as we could.  We did our best and it turned out that for me , our best
> > was good enough.  I felt more comfortable with my new POV than the one
> > that I had acquired from Maharishis.  That process continues today.
> 
> 
> I know. I was just riffing on a thought / reposne / self-evaluation,
> goofing on myself and life. (In no way a satiric dig at you.) 
> 
> On the more serious side, deconstructing personal myths -- and
> resourcing beliefs with original context and source (re my recent
> posts on articles indicating the ironic and disconcerting split of
> such) are valuable if not essential processes. Liberating. (Step right
> up, just do this simple method and you will be liberated! :) )
>


Reply via email to