--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> curtisdeltablues wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote:
> >
> >> Hugo wrote:
> >>
> >>> Interesting article here:
> >>>
> >>> http://mysterytopia.com/2008/07/meditate-on-it.html
> >>>
> >>> It doesn't really explain how mantras came to be
> >>> so powerful, if indeed they are actually different
> >>> from any other randomly chosen sound.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Think resonance. It is the resonant qualities of the sound
which
> >> determine the effect and the basis for Nada Yoga (the science of
> >> sound). Remember the TM lecture example of scratching your
> >>
> > fingernails > on the blackboard as an example of a sound that
wouldn't
> > probably make > very good mantra. :)
> >
> > Proof by analogy is just lame. Using an extreme example proves
> > nothing. There is no detectable difference between sounds like
the
> > mantra sounds and any other ordinary word. This is just an claim
> > supported by religious assertion IMO.
> >
> Nonsense. Go read up on nada yoga rather than make up your own
folk
> philosophy. And apparently you would think that there is no
difference
> between dissonance and consonance in music by your "folk
philosophy."
> :D :D :D
>
What is nada yoga?
Where do you see dissonance and consonance?
What the hell are you talking about?
