--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hagen J. Holtz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does the fact that it seemed to have been an "instruction" automatically > imply, that it had sufficient authentic strength not to doubt in its very mentally-scientific mechanics as such ? Please explain the details, why such a "mantra" ought to have been good enough or even better than what MMY had been teaching ! > > Hagen >
I ihave no opinion on any of that either way. I was only pointing out that if you believe that the Christian bible mentions meditation, than it isn't a stretch to believe that the Christian meditation mantra is "Jesus." L. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: sparaig > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 9:28 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Jesus, Mantra of God' > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hagen J. Holtz" <hagen.j.holtz@> > wrote: > > > > Aleging that Jesus was the mantra to God sounds to me like as if stemming > from a child, > raising a steer-similar toy on a couch while making "brumm, brumm" and > being totally > absorbed in its phantasy to be a cool driver of a car. It is funny and > causing concern at the > same time, how religious thought tries to adopt half-understood spiritual > tools in order to > give its whole crankiness a more (obviously necessary) sophisticated shape. > > > > "By no other name shall you know Him" sounds like an instruction for which > mantra > to use, in a meditation context, assuming that there was such a thing 2000 > years ago. > > Lawson >
