--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > > wrote: > > > It MAY be due to quantum interaction, that in itself is big news. > > > But affecting people at a distance? Very big news indeed. > > > > > > I find any nonchalance about breakthroughs like this puzzling. > > > You do realise this is highly important and paradigm shifting, > > > if true? Of course you do. > > > > > > > ********** > > > > It's not surprising about quantum interaction at a distance: > > > > "If two particles are entangled, they act in some respects as if > they > > were a single object," said Wootters. Everything that happens to > one > > of the entangled pairs instantly affects the other, no matter how > far > > apart each of the entangled particles is from the other. > > > > Braunstein likens entanglement to "a pair of ideal lovers who know > > each other so well that they could answer for their lover even if > > separated by long distances." > > > > http://tinyurl.com/561c > > All very clever but it doesn't have anything to do > with the brain. Particles in your mind don't become > entangled and then seperate to different parts of > space. This referes to laboratory experiments not > to the general run of events in nature. > > I especially don't think this is any sort of explanation > of the ME, though it wouldn't surprise me if TM physicists > had bought it into the debate, they are pretty shameless.
In fact I seem to remember Hagelin expouinding on this as an explanation for jyotish in one of his more way-out lectures. I wish I had rememebered more of the details but I was too busy crying into my hands...
