--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > > > In the interest of fairness and accuracy, > > I have just consulted that oracle of truth > > and wisdom, The Magic Ouija Board, > > and it has verified that yes, without a doubt, > > Barry's person is real and he is NOT LYING. > > > > What more could anyone ask for? > > I would like to see a cross reference with divination by sheep > intestines (the other popular "technology" for predicting the > future) if you don't mind.
I tried to verify Sal's findings using my Magic 8 Ball, but unfortunately all I got was "Reply hazy. Try again." Then again, that's a more honest prediction than the ones Lou Valentino makes. More accurate, too. :-) I honestly do think that this would be a fun, if non-conclusive test. The most fascinating thing about it, as I mentioned to the moder- ators in my email to them, is that this medical condition was actually predicted by a Jyotish practitioner a year before it appeared. Therefore, if one Jyotishi was able to see it in this person's chart, why wouldn't another one? Or maybe the first one just got lucky. That is *precisely* why this is an interesting test to me, and should be to those who wish to prove Jyotish credible. > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > wrote: > > > > On Dec 30, 2008, at 8:52 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Yes, John. Let's put your Ayurveda and Jyotish to the test. > > >> This is your big chance. How about it? > > > > > > Isn't it fascinating to see exactly WHO is > > > already pre-apologizing and finding reasons > > > to NOT put Jyotish to a blind test? > > > > > > There is no trick here. The birth data is > > > accurate, the person is a real person, and > > > the medical condition is a real condition. > > > > > > JohnR will either run a chart and report his > > > findings or he won't. What the pre-apologists > > > say about it doesn't affect what he says one > > > way or another. Seems to me they're trying > > > desperately to get him not to try, because > > > they're afraid he won't do very well, and > > > that'll cast an unfavorable light on some- > > > thing that Maharishi not only believed in, > > > but sold for large sums of money. > > > > > > In other words, so far the only people who > > > have objected to this "blind test" are TBs > > > who are objecting for patently TB reasons. > > > If they really believed in the "scientific > > > validation" of the things they believed in, > > > they wouldn't be making a fuss now, would > > > they? They'd be as interested in the results > > > as I am. > > > > > > Instead, they're trying to make sure that > > > Jyotish is never put to the test. > > > > In the interest of fairness and accuracy, > > I have just consulted that oracle of truth > > and wisdom, The Magic Ouija Board, > > and it has verified that yes, without a doubt, > > Barry's person is real and he is NOT LYING. > > > > What more could anyone ask for? > > > > Sal > > >
