--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rf...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: <snip> > > To trust The Turq to tell you anything with > > as much as a little core of truth is indeed > > "looney". > > I've been familiar with Barry Wright [Turquoise, > Uncle Tantra] and what he writes for more than > 10 years, Mr Nablusoss. What he asked for > in his post to John is totally reasonable.
Straw man; nobody said it wasn't. In the abstract, there's nothing wrong with it. But if you've learned *anything* about Barry from the 10 years you've been reading his posts, it's that he has absolutely no inhibitions about lying when he perceives it to be to his advantage to do so. (Goodness knows, he's lied about you plenty of times.) There's no reason to think he's telling the truth about having a friend with the birth data he supplied who has a particular medical condition. Since he wants to "disprove" Jyotish, it would be the easiest thing in the world for him to make up the friend and/or the data and/or the condition and then declare whatever John came up with to be wrong. There's no way for us to check the facts. If Barry wanted to disprove something *you* believed in, you'd be rightly skeptical about any "test" he came up with. The only reason you're so enthusiastic about this one is that you want to disprove Jyotish yourself.
