> 
> In the interest of fairness and accuracy,
> I have just consulted that oracle of truth
> and wisdom, The Magic Ouija Board,
> and it has verified that yes, without a doubt,
> Barry's person is real and he is NOT LYING.
> 
> What more could anyone ask for?
> 
> Sal

I would like to see a cross reference with divination by sheep
intestines (the other popular "technology" for predicting the future)
if you don't mind.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...>
wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2008, at 8:52 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, John. Let's put your Ayurveda and Jyotish to the test.
> >> This is your big chance. How about it?
> >
> > Isn't it fascinating to see exactly WHO is
> > already pre-apologizing and finding reasons
> > to NOT put Jyotish to a blind test?
> >
> > There is no trick here. The birth data is
> > accurate, the person is a real person, and
> > the medical condition is a real condition.
> >
> > JohnR will either run a chart and report his
> > findings or he won't. What the pre-apologists
> > say about it doesn't affect what he says one
> > way or another. Seems to me they're trying
> > desperately to get him not to try, because
> > they're afraid he won't do very well, and
> > that'll cast an unfavorable light on some-
> > thing that Maharishi not only believed in,
> > but sold for large sums of money.
> >
> > In other words, so far the only people who
> > have objected to this "blind test" are TBs
> > who are objecting for patently TB reasons.
> > If they really believed in the "scientific
> > validation" of the things they believed in,
> > they wouldn't be making a fuss now, would
> > they? They'd be as interested in the results
> > as I am.
> >
> > Instead, they're trying to make sure that
> > Jyotish is never put to the test.
> 
> In the interest of fairness and accuracy,
> I have just consulted that oracle of truth
> and wisdom, The Magic Ouija Board,
> and it has verified that yes, without a doubt,
> Barry's person is real and he is NOT LYING.
> 
> What more could anyone ask for?
> 
> Sal
>


Reply via email to