--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "I am the eternal"
<l.shad...@...> wrote:

I gotta say, this whole topic has added a bit of gravitas to FFL
lately.  This is profound shit and I greatly appreciate your sharing
your thinking process with us.  Your friend is lucky to have you as a
fellow health advocate for his care.  There are so many complicated
decisions and it is smart to go in with your eyes wide open.  No one
has a magic simple solution to complex medical issues.  Not being
afraid to jump into the complexity and seek different opinions goes
against our natural desire to find a simple solution.  I went through
this with some loved ones so I know how strong the tendency is to stop
going deeper and finding more complexity.  It gets overwhelming.  You
are being a good friend and I wish you both good luck.



>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Peter <drpetersutp...@...> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > >
> > > The arrogant bias against surgery has destined many
> > > individuals within the TMO, and
> > > without,  to death.  Do you think these now-deceased
> > > persons made some sort of point by
> > > refusing surgery, and then dying ?    Apparently there are
> > > some huge egos among us who aim
> > > for fame from a non-surgical 'cure'.  Wow !
> >
> > I don't see it as arrogance, more fear (which could be seen as a very
> > subtle arrogance, I guess) from ignorance and being perpetually
bombarded
> > with disinformation about "natural" cures. Once tumors have
formed, short of
> > a miracle, they have to be cutout or destroyed through radiation or
> > chemotherapy. After that, perhaps a healthy diet could have some
preventive
> > impact on future reoccurrence, but cancer has a strong genetic
component
> > that no diet will directly impact.
> >
> > There's a bias in the TMO regarding allopathic medicine. It was
recently
> > posted here about the Purusha guy who contracted a respiratory
infection
> > while in India for Maharishi's funeral. He came back to the
states, didn't
> > do anything other than meditate and take some herbs, developed
secondary
> > bacterial infections in his lungs and died. This is incredibly
stupid. What,
> > did he think antibiotics would "ruin" his changes for Enlightenment?
> >
> 
> My friend is waiting for his appointment with the prostate cancer
specialist
> on 9 January 2009.  There's nothing wrong with looking at all the
> alternatives.  This sort of surgery is not like a root canal.  It's
a pretty
> messy recovery period of about a year.
> 
> The first response is, is there an alternative route.  A bunch of
> alternatives were thrown at me in public and I'm still having to
fight off
> well meaning but off the mark nutrition and faith healing
suggestions.  But
> it's looking more and more like the robotic surgery, if available for my
> friend (if the cancer has not spread), is the way to go.
> 
> But that's not the end of it.  I received an interesting PDF file
from Johns
> Hopkins urging men to get a second and third opinion.  It turns out
that the
> biopsy report is very subject to interpretation and one pathologist
will see
> cancer all over the place and another will not see any.  So making
sure the
> diagnosis is correct is in the best interest of my good buddy.  The
> diagnosis will determine the course of treatment and obviously the
outcome.
> 
> Fear?  Obviously my friend is fearful and I am fearful for him.  But the
> fact is this appears to be a less cut (pardon the pun) and dried
situation,
> according to Hopkins, so it is worth the investigation.  I don't at
all see
> my asking if there were a nutritional cure as a bad, proud or magical
> thinking question.  I asked, I got the answers, I investigated the
answers,
> they were wanting and are discarded.  I'm sending my friend my
progress as I
> investigate this for him and he agrees which my assessment.  Now if my
> friend had Gleason 2-5, I would strongly urge him to try an
alternate cure
> for a few months while being monitored for progress of the cancer.
> 
> I can tell you that /I/ learned about 2 decades ago to cut out the
> foolishness about staying in bed and meditating extra because of a
"cold".
> I was on business in San Francisco.  I had this infection in the
lungs.  I
> stayed in for two days and meditated.  My boss called me up and asked me
> what the Hell I was doing.  I told him and he told me that we don't
do this
> sort of thing on company time.  He told me to tell the hotel (it was the
> Hyatt in Union Square) to call a doctor for me.  The doctor came to
my room,
> diagnosed me with a pretty serious case of bronchitis, prescribed some
> antiobiotics.  I had the prescription filled and continued
meditating.  It
> took two more days before I could go do my business.  For about 10
years I
> ran a tendency to get bronchitis and I've been very careful since
then to go
> to the doctor, fast.  OTOH if I can tell that I've just got a cold,
I'll do
> the extra meditations but I'll make sure I call the doctor.  If I'm
told "we
> have a lot of that going around, wait a few days then call us back" then
> I'll do that.
> 
> I don't think that one should fear or avoid death.  But life is a sacred
> gift that we hold onto as long as possible.  Now I have had friends
on THMD
> and THP who have died under circumstances where I think they should have
> sought real medical health first and foremost.  I'll just state that
as my
> opinion of events and leave it at that.  Doctors don't save lives
after all,
> they prolong them.
>


Reply via email to