so for now, all we have is the Maharishi's word that he was actually a life long celibate. absolutely no proof to the contrary.
the rest is just rumors, and for a public figure who was in close proximity to thousands of people, some with agendas of their own, there are always lots of rumors. i am curious why some of those here, like Vaj, and Curtis and geezerfreak and Barry feel it is so important to cling deperately to the possibility that the Maharishi was a liar in terms of his sex life? as if they are fundamentalists 180 degrees out from the TBs they so often criticize, but TBs themselves nonetheless. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > I can't imagine anyone putting in the time and trouble for something > which will be met with possibly legal battles from the movement and > such high animosity from its members.
