--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 <no_re...@...> wrote:
> i am curious why some of those here, like Vaj, and Curtis and > geezerfreak and Barry feel it is so important to cling deperately to > the possibility that the Maharishi was a liar in terms of his sex life? "Cling desperately" huh? The guy lied about all sorts of stuff it isn't the biggest stretch to think he might have lied about that. You ever stand in a group of women giving flowers to him? The adoration and his appreciation of it was intense. > > as if they are fundamentalists 180 degrees out from the TBs they so > often criticize, but TBs themselves nonetheless. I don't know if he did or didn't but give a better chance that he was a regular famous guy who enjoyed the perks. What I see little evidence for is that he was some kind of inhuman creature who didn't have human desires and failings. So I believe in human nature and I don't believe he was exempt. That had nothing to do with being a TB of any kind. Did you hang out with him? Or is your whole relationship on the fantasy level where keeping him in an idealized form is important to you? > > so for now, all we have is the Maharishi's word that he was actually a > life long celibate. absolutely no proof to the contrary. > > the rest is just rumors, and for a public figure who was in close > proximity to thousands of people, some with agendas of their own, > there are always lots of rumors. > > i am curious why some of those here, like Vaj, and Curtis and > geezerfreak and Barry feel it is so important to cling deperately to > the possibility that the Maharishi was a liar in terms of his sex life? > > as if they are fundamentalists 180 degrees out from the TBs they so > often criticize, but TBs themselves nonetheless. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > I can't imagine anyone putting in the time and trouble for something > > which will be met with possibly legal battles from the movement and > > such high animosity from its members. >
