On Feb 3, 2009, at 1:25 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:

As noted by my use of gender in the previous paragraph,
I also obviously have no problem with her being a woman.
Dawn is, after all, a female name, and she has certainly
not corrected anyone who has assumed that she is as
female in gender as her screen name. I don't, in fact,
see how her posts -- and the logic and clarity of thought
expressed in them -- could possibly have come from a man.
At least not a heterosexual man.

Maybe she's both.  Maybe she came here at first
as a man, but then had a little, um, operation, and...
presto!  Now she's a woman.

Well, stranger things have happened.  Although,
admittedly, probably not much stranger.

Sal

Reply via email to