--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <wgm4u@> wrote: > <snip> > > So why didn't MMY recommend in his formal teachings > > that TM was meant to be practiced *in conjunction* > > with your Religion? He didn't > > He *did*. Why do you think he made such a point > of TM being compatible with all religions??
Judy, if you can tell me where in MMY's *formal teachings*, the saying that TM should be practiced in conjunction with your Religion, I will never post on this subject again! And quietly disappear....:-) First of all, TM is NOT compatible with all religions! If you truly practice Catholicism, the Pope has recommended NOT practicing TM and called it a "cult of the Body"...previous Pope. You could say well, "in truth it is", and that may be true, but that doesn't translate into practicing your Religion in the context it's being taught, faithfully, today; ultimately you find your Religion is full of errors and flee! P.S. Making a comment in a lecture 40 years ago does NOT constitute a formal teaching!! FYI Also-> How do you explain MMY's term in the Gita, *means* for describing the limbs of Patanjali's Yoga?
