--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <wg...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <wgm4u@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <wgm4u@> wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > So why didn't MMY recommend in his formal teachings > > > > > that TM was meant to be practiced *in conjunction* > > > > > with your Religion? He didn't > > > > > > > > He *did*. Why do you think he made such a point > > > > of TM being compatible with all religions?? > > > > > > Judy, if you can tell me where in MMY's *formal > > > teachings*, the saying that TM should be practiced > > > in conjunction with your Religion, I will never > > > post on this subject again! And quietly disappear....:-) > > > > The whole section "Fulfillment of Religion" in Science of > > Being and Art of Living, especially the last four > > paragraphs. > > > > Bye-bye. > > Sorry but he doesn't make the argument that TM should > be practiced in conjuction with your Religion, he > suggests if you are Religious TM will be cool with > your Religion (that is, after you realize how stupid > it is)!
Read it again.
