--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> Shemp, Shemp, Shemp,
> 
> Please tell us the below was you being satirical.
> 
> Edg



My response to that, Edg, is similar to the response given to people who ask a 
salesman, say, how much the Rolls Royce in the showroom costs: if you have to 
ask, you can't afford it.

Edg, if you have to ask whether what I wrote was satirical you really aren't in 
a position to understand satire.





> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote:
> >
> > The problem with wind turbines is if you put up too many of them they will 
> > cut down all winds blowing across the world and this will cause our planet 
> > to stop spinning on its axis and we will all be throw into deep space along 
> > with planes, trains, automobiles, and anything else that isn't tethered to 
> > Mother Earth.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, I am the eternal <L.Shaddai@> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-energy3-2009apr03,0,7532220.story?track=rss
> > > 
> > > http://tinyurl.com/dzasmm*
> > > *
> > > Temperature difference caused by taking the power out of the wind would be
> > > around 1 degree difference, about the same as the localized effect of a
> > > city. *
> > > 
> > > *[image: Los Angeles Times] <http://www.latimes.com/>
> > > 
> > > The Interior Department report, which looks at the potential of wind
> > > turbines off the U.S. coast, is part of the government's process to chart 
> > > a
> > > course for offshore energy development.
> > > By Jim Tankersley
> > > April 3, 2009
> > >  Reporting from Arlington, Va. -- Wind turbines off U.S. coastlines could
> > > potentially supply more than enough electricity to meet the nation's 
> > > current
> > > demand, the Interior Department reported Thursday.
> > > 
> > > Simply harnessing the wind in relatively shallow waters -- the most
> > > accessible and technically feasible sites for offshore turbines -- could
> > > produce at least 20% of the power demand for most coastal states, Interior
> > > Secretary Ken Salazar said, unveiling a report by the Minerals Management
> > > Service that details the potential for oil, gas and renewable development 
> > > on
> > > the outer continental shelf.
> > > 
> > >  The biggest wind potential lies off the nation's Atlantic coast, which 
> > > the
> > > Interior report estimates could produce 1,000 gigawatts of electricity --
> > > enough to meet a quarter of the national demand.
> > > 
> > > The report also notes large potential in the Pacific, including off the
> > > California coast, but said the area presented technical challenges.
> > > 
> > > The Interior Department released an executive
> > > summary<http://www.doi.gov/ocs/ExecutiveSummary-final.pdf>of the
> > > report on Thursday.
> > > 
> > > It noted that "strong wind resources also exist offshore California, 
> > > Oregon,
> > > Washington and Hawaii, but it appears that the majority of this resource
> > > lies in deep waters where technology constraints are potentially
> > > significant" -- a sentiment Salazar echoed when asked about Pacific wind
> > > potential.
> > > 
> > > The report also suggests vast oil and gas reserves off the Pacific coast:
> > > the equivalent of 10 billion to 18 billion barrels of oil.
> > > 
> > > Salazar told attendees at the 25x'25 Summit in Virginia, a gathering of
> > > agriculture and energy representatives exploring ways to cut carbon 
> > > dioxide
> > > emissions, that "we are only beginning to tap the potential" of offshore
> > > renewable energy.
> > > 
> > > The report is a step in the Obama administration's mission to chart a 
> > > course
> > > for offshore energy development, an issue that gained urgency last year 
> > > amid
> > > high oil prices and chants of "Drill, baby, drill" at the Republican
> > > National Convention.
> > > 
> > > Critics have accused President Obama and Salazar of dragging their feet on
> > > new oil and gas drilling, and Thursday's report does little to rebut those
> > > complaints.
> > > 
> > > It includes no new estimates of potential oil and gas reserves offshore 
> > > and
> > > notes that some of the existing estimates are based on 25-year-old seismic
> > > studies.
> > > 
> > > Meeting with reporters after his speech, Salazar said he would wait to
> > > decide whether to commission new seismic studies until after he convened a
> > > four-stop series of offshore energy hearings, which begin next week in
> > > Atlantic City, N.J. In San Francisco, a hearing will be held April 16 at 9
> > > a.m. at the Mission Bay Conference Center at UC San Francisco.
> > > 
> > > Drilling advocates say updated estimates could show even more offshore oil
> > > potential.
> > > 
> > > In contrast, Salazar said he expected a push to expedite offshore wind
> > > development to be one of the most significant aspects at the hearings.
> > > 
> > > He pledged to finalize guidelines for such development, which the Bush
> > > administration failed to complete before leaving office, within about two
> > > months.
> > > 
> > > jtankersley@
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to