--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > > I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's > > > usually serves no purpose, and it's downright > > > dangerous during an epidemic. Just for the > > > record, and in my opinion. > > > > raunchydog wrote: > > Habit? Really? What two consenting adults > > do in the privacy of their bedroom is nobody's > > business and that is basic to the whole > > discussion about gay marriage. You're > > antiquated POV lost ground in 2003 when > > the Supreme Court invalidated anti-homosexual > > sodomy laws in Lawrence v. Texas. > > > Yes, I am opposed to most male thrusting, on > general principles, whether it's perpetrated > upon women or upon men. It serves no purpose > and should be discouraged. Thrusting is a habit > most men are addicted to. Most women who are > addicted to male thrusting are just feeding > the male ego. > > According to a recent survey of women, mere > thrusting hardly ever gives women satisfaction; > apparently most women tolerate this male custom > simply to avoid embarrassing the men, i.e., > women feel sorry for the thrusting men. >
IMO sex without trusting is like overcooked pasta, it's not nearly as satisfying to a woman's taste buds as al dente. > Read more: > > Subject: Viagra > From: Willytex > Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental > Date: October 10, 2001 > http://tinyurl.com/mxx8lv >
