--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, guyfawkes91 <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> > >
> > > To All:
> > > 
> > > Here's an interesting proposition from John Hagelin.
> > > It appears that he got this idea from the vedic literatures.
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84_kXpsDJEk
> > >
> > John's problem is that he never strays outside his
> > comfort zone. He only ever gives talks to non-physicists
> > who don't know anything much about the subject matter.
> 
> FWIW, what he's saying in this clip isn't some weird
> idea he dreamed up himself. The quantum foam concept
> came from John Wheeler back in the 1950s. The notion
> that the bubbles give birth to universes was proposed
> by physicist Andrei Linde in the 1990s. It's one of
> several competing approaches in the field of 
> theoretical physics. In that exotic context, it's
> mainstream.
> 
> It isn't Hagelin's physics that physicists have a 
> problem with; it's the connections he makes to 
> consciousness and the Vedic literature.
> 
> On the other hand, there's a bunch of highly
> credentialed (non-TM) physicists who are convinced
> there are very strong connections to be made between
> physics principles and consciousness. That's not
> mainstream yet, but it's getting there.

Stehphen Hawking is taking another approach to this inquiry.  He favors a model 
of the universe that follows all the laws of physics.  But like a novel that 
begs for more questions, he concludes that one cannot ask what happened before 
the Big Bang because nothing existed before then in scientific terms.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8Kp0rQ23PY

If you all have the time, you should watch the entire series of clips, five in 
all.







>


Reply via email to