You may as well be a wingnut.
I write to another list that's very right wing and find that there is more aggressive attacking from you about Obama [on anything at all you can dig up about him to attack him with] than any individual wingnut there - with the exception of a few clearly mentally challenged extremist sociopaths. My guess is it's quite apparent to most readers here except maybe for a couple of the resident right wingers that you have a personal grudge problem, Ms Dog with regard to your "Champion" Hillary losing to "an inadequate black man" [the latter in quotes is from from a frothing woman Obama hater after Obama was chosen over Hillary to run for president]. You'd fit right in with the current crop of fringe wingnut losers. Obama IS going to get a decent health care reform bill passed and the economy IS starting to gradually turn around despite your self-revealing and self-defeating incessant bitter carping. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchy...@...> wrote: > > "A backlash in the progressive base which pushed President Obama over > the top in the Democratic primary and played a major role in his general > election victory has been building for months. The fight over the public > option involves real policy substance, but it's also a proxy for broader > questions about the president's priorities and overall approach > > Meanwhile, on such fraught questions as torture and indefinite detention, > the president has dismayed progressives with his reluctance to challenge or > change Bush administration policy. > > And then there's the matter of the banks. > > I don't know if administration officials realize just how much damage > they've done themselves with their kid-gloves treatment of the financial > industry, just how badly the spectacle of government supported institutions > paying giant bonuses is playing. But I've had many conversations with people > who voted for Mr. Obama, yet dismiss the stimulus as a total waste of money. > When I press them, it turns out that they're really angry about the bailouts > rather than the stimulus but that's a distinction lost on most voters." > > PAUL KRUGMAN August 20, 2009 > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/21/opinion/21krugman.html?_r=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss >
