--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> wrote: > > > > On Mar 13, 2010, at 10:28 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote: > > > > > Ok Sal, I'm going to give it right back to you. I > > > remember when the John Edwards mistress, love child > > > story broke. You totally ridiculed me for buying into > > > it, because the story was broken by, OMG, "The National > > > Enquirer". > > > > Sounds *very* unlikely, lurk, as I've said here, more > > than once, that the NI usually gets its stories right, > > and has ever since the OJ Simpson case.
I was able to find only one post from Sal to this effect, made well after the Edwards discussion. In it, she agreed with Feste that the Enquirer was "very reliable." The story in question was about a purported affair of Sarah Palin. Sal was disappointed to hear that the Enquirer had reported that the affair had taken place 10 years previously, which meant the man (Palin's husband's business partner) was unlikely to have been Trig's father. <snip> > "Really scraping the bottom of the barrel, aren't we, > lurk? If this is how you and others support the Repugs, > heaven help them. You and your party deserve each other." > ----- And BTW, the Enquirer is up for a Pulitzer for the Edwards story.
