Wow, I really dislike having to carry things to this extent. But for the record, you did reproduce two of the posts, and gave numbers for the rest. If someone wishes to ignore that, or be "too busy" to read posts for today, then I guess that is where it stays. But in your post #243746 today at 9:59 am, they are laid out.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > Lurk: > > > No, I really don't care to > > > > Because you can't--they don't exist. > > Ah, but they do. > > > And In "true fashion," you don't have courage to own up to it. > > Care to bring up the posts? I didn't think so. > > I just did, not quite an hour before this post of Sal's. > Will she have the courage to own up to them? Will she have > the decency to apologize to Lurk for having falsely accused > him of having made them up and not having the courage to > admit it? > > Perhaps she carefully avoided reading my posts. If so, it > would be a kindness for someone to clue her in. > > But holding one's breath for an acknowledgment and apology > from Sal is probably not a great idea. >
