--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > On May 8, 2010, at 12:01 PM, WillyTex wrote: <snip> > > Maybe so, but you still have not addressed the > > central proposition made by MMY: the 'effortless > > transcending', first mentioned at Madras in 1957. > > > > We have discussed this on Usenet and FFL, but you > > have failed to defend your own 'anthill' delusion > > that TM requires effort. > > It's not my assertion, it's a basic foundational tenet of > Indian philosophy, including the yoga of Patanjali. > That's why the word for "effort" in Sanskrit is also the > word for "technique". If there's a technique involved, > there's always some form of effort involved, as Mahesh > even admitted in old TTC's.
MMY said, "TM isn't a technique. We call it a technique because it works."
