Can you say, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend"? I knew you could.
I'm sure you and Barry will be very happy together. <belly laugh> (For the record, I'm not and never have been a "press rep for the Maha," paid or otherwise.) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Don Miller" <pod1...@...> wrote: > > Being a new person and not knowing or caring about any of this or the real > issues behind it all, and not giving a rat's ass to study any of it, I would > like to venture my unbiased feelings. None of this is written as a joke. If > I make a joke it is usually just a one-liner and pertainate. > > That is a very good observation about self importance Barry, that self > importance blinds each one of us from seeing the world clearly and > innocently, depending on how much we cling to it. Of course you could still > be guilty of everything that Judy accuses you of, and of the beliefs that > others accuse you of. > > My intuition is that in spite of any false beliefs that you may or may not > hold, and in spite of any supposed sins, your energy body is the most clear > and untangled here of regular posters, and that is reflected in a certain > verbal agility. Have another orange juice. > > The energy body of Judy is an absolute mess, aside from the voracity or lack > thereof of her statements. She may be right or she may be wrong, but her > defensiveness and revealing of a huge ego are way out of proportion and > blocking her from seeing the forest from herself. At least two major fiber > bundles wrap up and over her right shoulder and reach all the way around to > her back, indicating a rigid and blind adherence to a belief system. I would > not want to be in her position as a press rep for the Maha, no matter how > much they paid me, because of all the negative attention stirred up by so > many people whacky people, who are themselves a total mess, and this can > wreak havoc on the energy body. > > On the other hand if the person has such a major challenge and difficulty in > life, and overcomes it, then it can be the making of the finest tempered > warrior spirit, par excellance. But I would not wish such difficulty on > myself, even if there was great payoff in coming out stronger. > > But first of all Judy, you need to take some immediate action to put your > energy body in order. I'll let you know if I come up with anything you > should do, but I think it involves water. Perhaps meditating in a warm pool > once in a while would do it. (Opps!!! That would be off the program!!) > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > Gonna take another hit at this one because it's so > > > utterly despicable. > > > > In the above, replace "Gonna" with "Gotta." > > Predictable. :-) > > > > All I'm sayin' is that there are only two > > people on FFL who repeat the phrase "Go > > back and read my posts on alt.m.t." as if > > it were a holy mantra, and as if there were > > some perceived benefit for other people > > in doing this. Those two people are Judy > > Stein and Willytex. > > > > Both trot out their past, and the imagined > > importance of it, the way some people show > > off photos of their kids. It's like "my > > posts on alt.m.t. and FFL" is a line item > > on their CV. > > > > And the only line item. > > > > Andrew Skolnick, whatever his occasional > > excesses, could point to any number of real > > achievements and awards as his CV. Some can > > point only to a series of posts made to two > > obscure Internet forums read at any given > > time in history by fewer than 100 people as > > if they are not only accomplishments, but > > *such* accomplishments that the authors feel > > that other people should "go back and read > > them" over and over and over. > > > > Just sayin'...doncha get the feeling some- > > times that *they* go back and read their > > own posts over and over and over, the way > > other old people pull out photos of their > > kids or look at the awards on their mantle- > > pieces over and over and over and feel all > > nostalgic for the glorious past? It's not > > the "lost in the past" thang that strikes > > me as odd, merely the utter insignificance > > of the past they're lost in. > > > > Add to this the INTENT of literally every > > such call to "go back and read my posts" -- > > an attempt to diss someone and get others > > to "pile on" and join in dissing them -- > > and IMO you've got a couple of exemplary > > examples of the 30-year benefits of the > > TM technique. A legacy to be proud of. > > >
