--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > In our Philosophy of Science core course at MIU in 1977, > David > > > > > Clay deconstructed the stress theory and clarified its > > > > > shortcomings. It was a clarifying if understated moments in > my > > > > > Maharishi education. > > > > > > > > I'd be interested to hear whatever you remember of > > > > what he said. > > > > > > The gist of it was, as I recall, Judy (and we've already > > > established the reliability of my memory in another > > > thread), the stress theory doesn't explain enough of > > > the phenomena we observe as a result of people > > > practicing TM. Here I'm at a loss for an example, > > > though, so please permit me to continue with generalities. > > > > > > Simply removing stress doesn't explain all the creative > > > or growth characteristics of the practice of TM. Those > > > characteristics suggest a larger theory at work which > > > we may call the consciousness theory. It would seem > > > consciousness is a field of all possibilities which, when > > > tapped, makes manifest those possibilities daily life. > > > > > > Sound familiar now? > > > > > > The stress theory deals with removing something > > > physical; the consciousness theory deals wtih adding > > > something spiritual. > > > > Sure, but MMY is very insistent that you can't > > really separate the two. Could it be stress, > > physical (neurological) impurities, that get in > > the way of tapping the field of all possibilities? > > > > For that matter, is it even *possible* to "add" > > anything spiritual, if we are That to begin with? > > > Excellent question; I would have to say No... more a case of > witnessing and unraveling the bodymind's samskaras/habit-patterns
As in, releasing stress? , > which in being fixed and "grooved" tend to obscure our appreciation > of THAT, or THAT's appreciation of THATself through us... :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
