Dear Vaj, By continuing to claim you took me down, or exposed that I was unenlightened, you prove conclusively that you have never done Transcendental Meditation, you never met Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, and you never made contact with my Unity Consciousness.
This assertion of yours demonstrates your absolute ignorance of the context of my enlightenment, and it is a violation of your own conscienceor, at best, evidence of the colossal extent of your mystical virginity when it comes to TM, Maharishi, and myself. You have no idea about my enlightenment. You have no idea what went on during those ten years. For you to present your story to a single human being who attended a seminar or dinner during those ten years would result in your story being unconditionally condemned as an outright falsehood. This is simply what is the case, Vaj. For instance, my very enlightenment itself was mechanically leveraged off of the attempt of anyone to challenge the metaphysics of the context within which I acted at that time. For you to have attempted in any way to press me in the way you have said you didnot to mention issuing in the result you have proudly boasted ensuedwould have resulted in an unforgettable experience of being put in your place, and you would then know something about what TM, Maharishi, and my enlightenment was all about. Look, the whole thing is ludicrous, Vaj. Ironically, as it turns out, *I did in fact need to be confronted*; however that confrontation was executed by my best friend, whose motives were pure, whose knowledge of me was comprehensive, and whose inspiration was indefectible. If you can provide any witness who will go towards establishing even a scintilla of evidence for what you claimed in the post that Judy has made available to me, I shall put myself permanently in Coventry, and ask for your forgiveness. The only thing that happened in that encounter was my dogged and fanatical refusal to submit myself to the context of the astrological reading of myself, drawn up by one of Maharishi's Indian confederatesa prestigious astrologer. Because I considered the idea of the stars having anything to do with my free will the insidious subversion of my Catholic soul. This doctrinaire rigidity and inflexibility, that may have had the appearance of something laughableto those outside of the Catholic fold; but for me, I was being true to Mary and her grace. Or so I thought. I could not compromise myself. This is all. And I remember that my reasons for objecting to reading my chart were unassailable. So no dignity or integrity was in the least compromised by my stance. There was nothing else that happened that afternoon; my enlightenment never came into the discussion, much less into the actual dynamics of the interpersonal exchanges. You know this, Vaj. That you fell into the temptation to concoct a false story about that incident was evidently irresistible; but had you talked to any person who knew me in those ten yearslike for instance Douglas Kyou would never mention this ludicrous tale again. I am surprised that no one has personally confronted you with the preposterousness of this story. I have said enough. Any notion that there is even, infinitesimally, any truth in what you have said (in what Judy posted that was one of your posts from five years ago) and in what you insinuate here I reject categorically. Robin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Nov 5, 2011, at 12:02 AM, maskedzebra wrote: > > > Again, it is not a matter of being determined that no one shall know that > > that I have lost a battle as it were; it is a question of truth, If what > > Vaj said happened that day did not happen, then I need to set the record > > straight. It did not happen. And this is an extraordinary act of mendacity > > on Vaj's part. > > > I'm sorry, not to be mean, but you were totally clueless at the time as to > what went down. Gary in particular got a real kick out of what went down, as > he couldn't stop laughing. And since he's mentioned it to me several times > since then, I know he remembers it. And he still can't stop laughing when he > remembers. > > Suffice to say, your unenlightenment was sufficiently proven for all of us, > that evening. > > Since I still use this technique on the faux-enlightened, I will not reveal > the technique in public. >
