--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> > wrote: > > O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed out an > unintended irony, a lie or a wiggle from owning up to an error because > and only because the person she confronted is a TM critic. Bet you a > buck you can't and I'll bet you another buck Judy would be the first to > dig up such a post if it existed. > > > Raunch, > > If I had the time, I bet I could show you plenty of instances where > something is parsed to the point where it becomes nonsensical. You can > always find a way to have a "technical" win, at the expense of common > sense. > > Have you ever observed anything along these lines? >
Steve, the point is that Barry routinely claims Judy comes after him because he is a TM critic, which is simply not true. This is the facade he hides behind so he never has to confront the specific issues she raises. zarzari_786 buys into Barry's claim and makes the false assumption that Judy criticizes Barry because he is a TM critic. Good Lord, haven't you noticed there's plenty to criticize about Barry's posts, usually loaded with unintended irony, quite apart from the fact that he happens to be a TM critic? The issue you raise about parsing and a technical win at the expense of common sense has nothing to do with my challenge to zarzari_786 for putting his foot in his mouth. If you want to keep digging yourself a hole on this one, you can take it up with Judy.
