--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> Vaj you say:
> "Once Robin had made a complete and utter fool out of himself, you're right, 
> he did have that reason to make a quick 'exit stage left'."
> 
> Are you speaking of his Open Letter to Barry here? Because shortly after that 
> he left. And if you contend that he made a fool of himself in his letter I 
> don' think you and I read the same post. If you think he made a fool of 
> himself because he said he had struck people within the context of Sunnyside 
> how does that compute? He still asserted, as I did, that he did not hit 
> people or engage in physical assault in any way at seminars. That had been 
> the question and that was still the answer. It is like asking someone if they 
> drank beer when they watch football. "No", they say. Then they admit 
> later,"Well, but I did drink beer when I used to bowl ten years before that." 
> How does this make them a liar? 
> 
> Then you write,"But there's no excuse for an old friend not to give a kind 
> "hello" or  
> > some words of acknowledgment to you. No one's that busy. And you were  
> > a pretty important person in his circle."
> 
> Who are you to comment on my relationship with Robin and what he should or 
> should not do? First of all, FFL is hardly the place to start inviting people 
> to tea or, at the other extreme, to welcome someone back into one's life 
> given the circumstances and the rare and complex nature of what that life was 
> for the two people before. We aren't talking about old college roommates 
> here,"Hey bud, how's it goin'? Long time, no see. How's it hangin'? We should 
> go out for a couple a beers, eh?" I would never expect or want Robin to 
> approach me via FFL. This place is not what our relationship in the past was 
> about and I would not want it to be what it may have become in the future. He 
> and I both respect that unspoken fact. And it gives me optimism that we still 
> understand each other on some fundamental level. So Vaj, at the risk of 
> sounding really rude, you are placing the most mundane expectations on a far 
> more complex relationship than you obviously grasp. Stop trying to define 
> what would be inexcusable or not for Robin (your really don't know him AT 
> all, whether you were there all those years ago or not, ultimately you have 
> no idea who he was or is). And because of that fact I have changed my mind 
> about addressing the last part of your post. If you don't get it by now Vaj, 
> you never will. Whether it is because you just aren't able to or because you 
> willfully continue to be perverse I don't know. And at this point I am 
> starting not to care. Sorry about that.
> 

In my opinion, "perverse, subtly vain, narcissistic, prone to hypomania, 
personality disorder" nails it.

Reply via email to