--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > Share:> > AND disagreeing with Robin does not equal being compliant > > > > with Curtis. > > > > Judy: > It does if what Curtis wants is for you to disagree with > > > Robin. > > > > M: Again we have the condescending assumption that if I > > express an opinion about Robin's post, it will influence > > Share's opinion about it. > > Let's see, now, would that be the same condescending > assumption you and Barry keep making about those who > happen to share my opinions?
M: No it isn't and I've explained why it is different to you one too many times. > > <snip> > > What you are doing here is imagining something to > > shame me for: wanting Share to disagree with Robin. > > I don't think I'm imagining it, Curtis. Not after your > attempt to turn me against Robin back in March. (Not > to mention your flat-out lie that I hadn't quoted him > after that attempt.) M: I was not attempting that. I already explained what I was doing. It did shut you down to my satisfaction. That was my goal and I got it. > > > And Share was right, even if I wanted it, which I couldn't > > care less about, her disagreement with Robin is not her > > being compliant with mine. > > You've just disarmed yourself of that particular weapon > as you've been using it against me. M: Whatever. We are talking past each other mostly anyway. > > > She is all grown up now and doesn't need you to tousle her hair. > > She isn't as grown up as she thinks, but that's another story. M: You have a limitless supply of condescension don't you? >