--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: (snip) > > > > No, I haven't read Life Divine. > > > > > > I thought so. > > > > > > > I'm going by your description > > > > of it, which, for anyone who understands Robin's POV, rules > > > > out any possible interest on Robin's part. > > > > > > Translation: I have nothing constructive to contribute, > > > > Translation: Letting navashok know he's wrong about something > > is not anything he considers constructive. > > So how exactly would you know he is wrong, not having read > the book?
I already told you how. Go back and read what I wrote again, see if you can find it. > Navashok thinks that this book, or one of the other books by > Aurobindo, could be useful/interesting to Robin. Why not let > Robin decide, if he follows this suggestion or not? What makes you think I can somehow keep him from deciding whether he wants to read it? I haven't been addressing him, I've been addressing you. Robin reads what he wants to read. > Since you don't even know about what the book is. See above. > Almost none of your posts is constructive. Because you are > always so guarded to not actually say something concrete, > so you always have a back-door and can twist it later, to > 'win' your arguments. That's a bullshit excuse for your inability to "win" the arguments you start with me. Don't blame me for your problems comprehending English.
