--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > So Judy, any criticisms for Ravi's over the top post below? Right. I > thought not. Even though it was obviously way over the top. And it is the > one that prompted Steve to respond to Ravi. But right, focus on Steve and > me and our alleged wrong doings. Dredge up the past if need be. But > definitely ignore Ravi's extreme over reaction. So much for friend's being > able to speak frankly with each other.Â
Each to our own opinion on Ravi's post. I found it rather humorous because it was typical of his style and the playfulness in it felt less than 'over the top' to me. But I have found that you don't have the most active sense of humour, especially when something is directed at you. You like to 'play' but only when it deflects or is a way for you to skirt around things. Still, you do have your supporter in Steve so that is nice for you. He is very staunch. > > > Judy to Ravi in Mission > Accomplished thread: > > Good enough, Ravi, thanks. We should all be able to > speak frankly to those we care about. > > > ________________________________ > From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:57 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > >  > Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door > > 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep > > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share? > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > > > > >I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand smiley > >smile (-: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM > >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > >Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > > >"The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them." > > > > > >Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated platitude detector of > >FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on FFL. You are hereby > >declared to be the avatar of Mother Saraswati. You no longer need to visit > >any healers, quantum light weavers - your weaknesses have been reduced to > >naught in one fell swoop, you have been totally healed - no longer you are > >one of the billions with positives and negatives. Go forth and start your > >own cult O' Wise lady. > > > >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > > > > >> > >>Doc, I appreciate what you say about astral being a reflection of > >>consciousness. Want to add that 2 spiritual teachers I respect a lot say > >>that there is a definite distinction between the celestial and astral > >>realms. The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>________________________________ > >> From: "doctordumbass@..." <doctordumbass@...> > >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >>Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM > >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, > >>Pros and Cons] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, parallels our > >>consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each reading the same > >>thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight one gets from > >>practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means like peyote (ick) or > >>mescaline (ugh) or LSD (yuck), will bring you into that world, according to > >>your level of consciousness at the time. > >> > >>Those that experience unpleasant entities are merely seeing the astral > >>manifestation of their consciousness. Astral means the entire universe of > >>subtle sight. Of course, once a person is familiar with the full scope of > >>Being in the astral world, one goes wherever one wants to - Um, kinda like > >>in "real" life. > >> > >>However, it is important to note what one sees with each exploration, most > >>of which will take a matter of seconds, popping in and out. If the > >>consciousness is clean, it will naturally be experiencing the Celestial > >>world, or I suppose, "upper astral". Also, the dynamics are just like > >>anything else - with more experience, one has greater discrimination, and > >>freedom of motion. > >> > >>If the reverse is true, (and one's consciousness is full of "suspended > >>solids" - lol), and one forces one's way into the astral, they will > >>probably see and meet lower entities. Not necessarily demons and criminals, > >>but tricksters and manipulators. This is what is commonly called "the > >>astral world" (by dopes like Lenz), but is actually a subset, based on > >>limited access. > >> > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: > >>> > >>> Freebie from Doc: > >>> > >>> This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called "ass-tral" - > >>> lol, because those that focus on the astral world, vs. Celestial, have a > >>> low consciousness. > >>> > >>> Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really should be avoided > >>> for all the trouble it causes. The horror movie makers seem to profit, > >>> but that's about it. > >>> > >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks for this. I've heard similar ideas from tantric > >>> > > teacher David Deida. Also I'm thinking that pushing it > >>> > > out opens one's aura to astral entities. True? > >>> > > >>> > I doubt it. I would say, and I know that Rama did > >>> > say, that the thing that most opens one up to astral > >>> > entities is spending any time whatsoever thinking > >>> > about astral entities. What you focus on you become. > >>> (schnipp) > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
