The monkey, the mannequin, and the squeeze toy. Funny to see Boy Scientist Curtis in his lab coat, railing at the podium one minute, and then when the subject changes to interpersonal dynamics, he is suddenly dumb as a post.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > His Holiness must be just chilling out yeah? In a jovial, playful mood? Sweet > to see his antics. > > Because applying your disinterested, impartial POV persona I'm able to gather > a lot of information even from that compacted text. > > I won't be waiting for yours and Guru Xeno's disinterested, impartial > analysis though because we know your personas and your target, captive > audience. > > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > > Hilarious, what a project. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > > > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's > > > comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > > > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > > > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced > > > the remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > > > > > Robin: > > > > > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped > > > inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends > > > which falsify why it exists.' > > > > > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and > > > Robin; "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a > > > person he does not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of > > > A, Barry does demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she > > > is subjectively reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your > > > representation of what I said about Barry (you took over what that > > > analysis was and made it over into your own image of what you wanted it > > > to be: there was hardly anything left of it after that) indicate you were > > > at all interested in anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my > > > analysis. "Funny thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away > > > in the saying of it.' > > > > > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > > > > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB > > > to fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not > > > been informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what > > > AWB declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you > > > have sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > > > > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, > > > Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you > > > that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus > > > operandi.' > > > > > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this > > > tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or > > > handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all > > > times.' > > > > > > > >
