[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]

[laughinggull108]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Steve, Laughing One Jelly Bean called me a 
> literary monster!  Will you go pummel him for me?  
> BTW, hope you had a wonderful Passover (-:
> 

Let's not forget that I also called myself one...I'm the "or two"...and also 
Jim. Does that mean I get three pummelings? Oh dear!

> 
> ________________________________
>  From: seventhray27 <steve.sundur@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:10 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
>  
> 
>   
> Hey, at least he's gotten into doing some research with regard to his 
> postings.  That's a new twist.  And aren't we sorely tried to  find 
> something new in anything he posts?  Like he's found a new pastime.  As Edg 
> would say, "Good on ya Ravi"
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally 
> > forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT 
> > the one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes.  Obviously the San 
> > Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning 
> > Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about!  His brain I 
> > mean.  Neuroscience and all that bullocks.  Anyway, more evidence of 
> > this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape 
> > and inauthenticity.  Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?!  
> > And all the effing this and effing that.  One is sorely tempted to urge 
> > Nephew to get some new material for gosh sakes!  It's a new year.  
> > Even in Western astrology.  Even in the Chinese system.  It's a new 
> > season.  It's almost a new month.  Get with the new program, 
> > Newphew!  Sorry couldn't resist that lame pun smiley faces all 
> > around.  
> >     
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me."
> > 
> > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least 
> > honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man 
> > basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in 
> > your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with 
> > words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really 
> > reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as 
> > if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like 
> > Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made 
> > her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies 
> > offline.
> > 
> > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!!
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@ wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > >  
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" awoelflebater@ wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made 
> > >> it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was 
> > >> randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program 
> > >> to do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is 
> > >> often sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail 
> > >> to take in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text 
> > >> compactors already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I 
> > >> don't require a computer to do it FOR me!
> > >
> > >
> > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and 
> > well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of 
> > Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far 
> > too much. Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. 
> > Some manual editing might be needed. The software works better if the 
> > original document has a well defined structure.
> > >
> > >'HOW IT WORKS'
> > >
> > >'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of 
> > >each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence 
> > >based on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The 
> > >most important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest 
> > >frequency count.'
> > >
> > >'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to 
> > >text summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository 
> > >text such as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results 
> > >can be skewed when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is 
> > >not recommended for use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary 
> > >people, places, events).'
> > >
> > >As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin 
> > >and his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about 
> > >imaginary places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. 
> > >But of course I can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a 
> > >screen to me.
> > >
> > >
> >
>