I had forgotten about my earlier exposition on His Holiness, into The Holy 
Trinity. The triumverate, in glorious worship of the "dead little man" persona. 

Two little candles, B and C, with puddles at their feet, in the face of the 
noonday sun. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote:
>
> A blast from the past -
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300308
> 
> (for the clueless doctordumbass = futur.musik)
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:49 PM, doctordumbass@... <
> no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> > **
> >
> >
> > The monkey, the mannequin, and the squeeze toy. Funny to see Boy Scientist
> > Curtis in his lab coat, railing at the podium one minute, and then when the
> > subject changes to interpersonal dynamics, he is suddenly dumb as a post.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > His Holiness must be just chilling out yeah? In a jovial, playful mood?
> > Sweet to see his antics.
> > >
> > > Because applying your disinterested, impartial POV persona I'm able to
> > gather a lot of information even from that compacted text.
> > >
> > > I won't be waiting for yours and Guru Xeno's disinterested, impartial
> > analysis though because we know your personas and your target, captive
> > audience.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hilarious, what a project.
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > <anartaxius@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and
> > Ann's comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor
> > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I
> > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the
> > remainder by about 50%. This is the result:
> > > > >
> > > > > Robin:
> > > > >
> > > > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you
> > trapped inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited
> > for ends which falsify why it exists.'
> > > > >
> > > > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and
> > Robin; "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person
> > he does not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry
> > does demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is
> > subjectively reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your
> > representation of what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis
> > was and made it over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there
> > was hardly anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all
> > interested in anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis.
> > "Funny thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the 
> > saying
> > of it.'
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.'
> > > > >
> > > > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed
> > AWB to fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has
> > not been informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what
> > AWB declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you
> > have sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.'
> > > > >
> > > > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my
> > analysis, Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not
> > give you that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus
> > operandi.'
> > > > >
> > > > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have
> > this tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or
> > handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all
> > times.'
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
>


Reply via email to