Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Steve, Laughing One Jelly Bean called me a literary monster! Will you go pummel him for me? BTW, hope you had a wonderful Passover (-:
________________________________ From: seventhray27 <steve.sun...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:10 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] Hey, at least he's gotten into doing some research with regard to his postings. That's a new twist. And aren't we sorely tried to find something new in anything he posts? Like he's found a new pastime. As Edg would say, "Good on ya Ravi" --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally > forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the > one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Obviously the San Diego sun > and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning Ravi of > course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His brain I mean. > Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence of this addling > is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape and > inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! And all the > effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge Nephew to get > some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. Even in Western > astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new season. It's almost a > new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that > lame pun smiley faces all around. >    > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest > - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, > of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with > words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a > word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - > everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then > equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if > she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to > ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" awoelflebater@ wrote: > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it > >> longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > >> randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to > >> do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often > >> sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take > >> in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors > >> already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a > >> computer to do it FOR me! > > > > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well > designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's > was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far too much. > Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. Some manual > editing might be needed. The software works better if the original document > has a well defined structure. > > > >'HOW IT WORKS' > > > >'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of > >each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence > >based on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The most > >important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest frequency > >count.' > > > >'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to text > >summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository text > >such as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results can be > >skewed when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is not > >recommended for use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary people, > >places, events).' > > > >As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin and > >his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about imaginary > >places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. But of course > >I can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me. > > > > >
