No, no, but then he said and then you said, and then he said, and then you said...
I forget what it is you are trying so desperately to be right about concerning my interactions with Robin, but if you are happy so am I. You proved what you wanted to the people who think like you, and I did the same. Works for me. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > Oh that. Well I know that you don't have the emotional IQ to follow it, or > > you wouldn't have set yourself up this way. So I'll write this for Robin. > > <snicker> That's a fine start, Curtis. Let's see where > you're going to go with this: > > > Robin, who kind of prides himself in being able to > > understand people deeply, and in fact elevates his > > personal opinions to being much more than that, to > > being able to detect who is more aligned with REALITY, > > is by your narrative... > > > > a hapless idiot who got played by an insincere and > > seemingly pathologically devious person in the context > > of hundreds of hours of conversations on FFL and in > > emails. > > Well, it's actually by *his* narrative: > > "I have been naive and trusting way beyond what was > appropriate in your case....I was naive and foolish in > whatever I read into our friendship during those long > conversations, both online and offline. I have assumed > you are someone you are not....I understand; the fault > lies in me to have had such lofty and unrealizable > expectations." > > > In my version we were both sincere in enjoying each other's > > friendship in the beginning > > Oh, I'm sure you were both enjoying it. My goodness, he > appreciated the living daylights out of you. You were > inspired to be at your very most charming and creative > and funny. You reveled in his attention and admiration; > you never had a better audience on FFL. > > > until Robin decided that his judgements about me were > > more important to him than his friendship with me. > > Well, now, that's not quite true, is it, Curtis? This is > how he concluded the final post of his five-parter: > > "Look, Curtis, in going through this exercise with you I > feel my heart has opened again to you, with all that that > entails: the risk, the re-disillusionment, the resurrection, > the hope, the unconditioned and influenced by the past > beginning. I am starting over, because this intense locking > up with you has brought back the superb and unparalleled > experience of enjoying your spirit. So let's try this on.... > > "This has been good for me, Curtis; I believe we have really > cleared the air. But we have to see if we have between us > wrought a kind of miracle whereby we really do experience > that our friendship can take us over again, and we start with > only an imagined past. Or rather, we only let our personal > history be determined by what was positive, which constituted— > I have calculate this very carefully and exactly—97.47% of our > previous interaction. > > "Good night, Curtis." > > Doesn't get much more heartfelt than that. > > And your response? You blew him off. You had no interest > whatsoever in reconciling with him. > > What I quoted above, Robin excoriating himself for having > been too naive and trusting, was his reply to your blowing > off his proposal that the two of you start over. > > Oooooopsie! > > > And I am not really sure which of the many judgements he > > has laid on me since the falling out is the real reason, > > if there is only one, that caused him to make that choice. > > Which choice, the one to try to reconcile with you and > start over again that you blew off? > > > It is this area that you have been idiotically speculating > > about under the guise of catching me lying, > > Oh, I haven't been "speculating about" anything, Curtis. > I have asserted that, contrary to your claim, the > falling-out had nothing to do with your not accepting > that Robin was in Unity consciousness a quarter of a > century ago. I stand by that assertion; there is no > evidence for that claim in what was posted on FFL. > > > while completely oblivious to the effect of your agenda > > on the very person you profess to shed tears for. > > So tell me, Curtis, what *is* the effect of my agenda on > Robin? > > > Pretty funny huh Judy? > > It's very funny indeed watching you struggling to > extricate yourself from the hole you've dug and only > making it deeper. Want to play another round? I'm game. > I'll have to find a way to move that bus off you first, > though. >
