--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > In scandal control, > The New TM Org Standing Committee of TM that is representing and in control > of Transcendental Meditation since the passing of Maharishi has missed every > opportunity to come out saying "no we are not that, we are this..." The > escapades of Girish Varma recently is another one of those opportunities for > anyone on the Standing Committee of TM to come out front and declare who they > are morally now and what they are doing going forward with the New TM Org. > Their vacuum and inability to do this is deafening. They as a result are > being defined by their scandal. This is not good for the future of > Transcendental Meditation. Someone with some courage needs to step forward > and re-define themselves. Someone like that TM priest from Latin America who > can speak with some moral authority. The others have abdicated their chances > at it. > -Buck in the Dome > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > The whole TM movement could take a page from political advisers consulting > > about the rehabilitation of public figures who mis-stepped. Come out > > saying repeatedly you are sorry, that you are not that, ask for > > forgiveness, and move on. Like the guy coming back from stupid scandal > > running for Mayor of New York now. > >
In Scandal Control; Or Mark Sanford also as example advised to say he is sorry, over and over again, and asking to give him a second chance... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Sanford http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2013/03/20/mark-sanford-hopes-for-second-chance-after-argentina-affair-derailed-his/ > > Scandal is defined as "loss of or damage to reputation caused by actual or > > apparent violation of morality or propriety." Scandal is not the same as > > controversy, which implies two differing points of view, or unpopularity. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_political_sex_scandals_in_the_United_States > > > > -Buck, the TM-running-dog of FFL > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <richard@> > > wrote: > > > > > > feste37: > > > > No deal. I have no anger toward you. I just > > > > think it's pathetic to use this forum to > > > > accuse others of sexual immorality. You > > > > admit it's just gossip. You don't even know > > > > the man. An accusation like that makes you > > > > look bad, far more so than your intended > > > > target. It makes you look petty and vicious > > > > and self-righteous. Are you without sin, > > > > Duveyoung? If not, STFU about others. > > > > > > > Well, we don't know much about Edg's private > > > sex life, if he has one. But, I don't see how > > > a guy that's been working for free for the TMO > > > 'for 29' years would have any money to defend > > > himself, if he were sued for slander. > > > > > > Is adultery even illegal in Iowa? > > > > > > > > Hey, let me double down: I say it's > > > > > absolutely true that he was an adulterer. > > > > > THERE, now let him sue me. I got the money > > > > > and the time to rake him over the coals. > > > > > I bet I could get hundreds of witnesses. > > > > > It would be spectacular! > > > > > > > > > > And Fester, you gotta look at your anger > > > > > towards me as much as I have to look at my > > > > > anger toward Heggy.....deal? > > > > > > > > > > >
