> >
> > In scandal control,
> > The New TM Org Standing Committee of TM that is representing and in control
> > of Transcendental Meditation since the passing of Maharishi has missed
> > every opportunity to come out saying "no we are not that, we are this..."
> > The escapades of Girish Varma recently is another one of those
> > opportunities for anyone on the Standing Committee of TM to come out front
> > and declare who they are morally now and what they are doing going forward
> > with the New TM Org. Their vacuum and inability to do this is deafening.
> > They as a result are being defined by their scandal. This is not good for
> > the future of Transcendental Meditation. Someone with some courage needs
> > to step forward and re-define themselves. Someone like that TM priest from
> > Latin America who can speak with some moral authority. The others have
> > abdicated their chances at it.
> > -Buck in the Dome
> >
In our movement's Scandal Control,
Actually Hagelin is in a good position to do this now. Hagelin could do it.
Just asserting from his position, Saying "We are not that", be transparent
hence forth and move forward. Just keep saying "we are not that", "This is
what we are doing..", "This is who we are in character.." , "..we could use
your help", and move on. Over and over again.. We need this leadership now a
whole lot more actually.
-Buck
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > >
> > > The whole TM movement could take a page from political advisers
> > > consulting about the rehabilitation of public figures who mis-stepped.
> > > Come out saying repeatedly you are sorry, that you are not that, ask for
> > > forgiveness, and move on. Like the guy coming back from stupid scandal
> > > running for Mayor of New York now.
> > >
>
> In Scandal Control;
> Or Mark Sanford also as example advised to say he is sorry, over and over
> again, and asking to give him a second chance...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Sanford
>
> http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2013/03/20/mark-sanford-hopes-for-second-chance-after-argentina-affair-derailed-his/
>
>
> > > Scandal is defined as "loss of or damage to reputation caused by actual
> > > or apparent violation of morality or propriety." Scandal is not the same
> > > as controversy, which implies two differing points of view, or
> > > unpopularity.
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_political_sex_scandals_in_the_United_States
> > >
> > > -Buck, the TM-running-dog of FFL
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <richard@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > feste37:
> > > > > No deal. I have no anger toward you. I just
> > > > > think it's pathetic to use this forum to
> > > > > accuse others of sexual immorality. You
> > > > > admit it's just gossip. You don't even know
> > > > > the man. An accusation like that makes you
> > > > > look bad, far more so than your intended
> > > > > target. It makes you look petty and vicious
> > > > > and self-righteous. Are you without sin,
> > > > > Duveyoung? If not, STFU about others.
> > > > >
> > > > Well, we don't know much about Edg's private
> > > > sex life, if he has one. But, I don't see how
> > > > a guy that's been working for free for the TMO
> > > > 'for 29' years would have any money to defend
> > > > himself, if he were sued for slander.
> > > >
> > > > Is adultery even illegal in Iowa?
> > > >
> > > > > > Hey, let me double down: I say it's
> > > > > > absolutely true that he was an adulterer.
> > > > > > THERE, now let him sue me. I got the money
> > > > > > and the time to rake him over the coals.
> > > > > > I bet I could get hundreds of witnesses.
> > > > > > It would be spectacular!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And Fester, you gotta look at your anger
> > > > > > towards me as much as I have to look at my
> > > > > > anger toward Heggy.....deal?
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
