Steve, have a wonderful few days off. Forget about all this FFL stuff and enjoy 
your family and your time away. I am sure you work very hard so take this time 
to revel in the fruits of your labours. Safe travels.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you Jim.
> A couple things come to mind. (as I am here at work, getting things in
> order so that I can go on vacation tomorrow with a somewhat unfettered
> mind)
> I am not sure if I have as much invested in this site as Judy.  On the
> other hand, I do tend to trust my judgments, which many times are snap
> judgements.
> And it may be that when I take the time, to look more closely at
> something, (as I did recently at Judy's prodding), such as whether Robin
> was being truthful when he said he didn't strike someone, (and the
> context), then it may be that I modify my position some.
> But in that exact example a lot of effort was expended for a pretty
> small adjustment.
> I think the main complaint I hear about me is that I am too emotional in
> my judgments.
> Perhaps I am.
> On the other hand, it is always nice to have the real world to help you
> keep score on things.
> I will read over what you've written and see if anything else comes to
> mind.
> But I just don't know if I can come around to seeing Judy in a different
> light, than what I do.
> I'll try to keep an open mind.
> Thanks for your feedback.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >
> > Hey Steve, I've been following this back and forth, for awhile. In
> terms of how you like to interact here, which I think mirrors your daily
> life and work, congenial, comes to mind. You and I could probably go to
> lunch and not mention TM, or any of the FFL topics, and still have
> plenty to yak about, and have a good time. I enjoy not always winding
> everything out, too.
> >
> > On the other hand, it was my business and skill for many years, to
> ensure clarity and understanding regarding the design, development, and
> transfer of very technical knowledge, to engineers and technicians, so
> that satellites, lasers, large phone switches, and data centers, for
> example, didn't fuck up. As a result, I can determine, when I want to
> put the effort into it, now that I don't *have* to, whether or not
> someone is being illogical, exaggerating, skewing material, has a hidden
> agenda, etc. Over so many years of analysis, it becomes obvious.
> >
> > Judy has a very consistent approach here. She is intent on unraveling
> the writing of those who are professing to say one thing, and in fact,
> through the mechanisms I referred to earlier, are saying something quite
> different. Further, if someone is simply expressing something, is there
> integrity in the expression?
> >
> > We do not have the luxury here to evaluate someone's body language and
> expressions here. It is all expressed through writing. So, the
> interactions between us are sometimes less than congenial, because there
> is no other way to further the thoughts expressed, sometimes, than to
> take exception. In everyday interaction, a raised eyebrow, or quick joke
> may suffice to move a conversation along, but here, with writing as the
> only tool, everything must be spelled out.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bless you Judy.  I am going to take a nod from the Share playbook
> and
> > > offer you compassion.
> > > You'll have to find someone else to play with tonight.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27"
> steve.sundur@
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > sure Judy.  Carry on with your truth campaign.  as Curtis
> aptly
> > > > > > > pointed out: for someone to constantly declare how
> "dedicated to
> > > > > > > truth" they are, is not unlike the magician telling everyone
> > > > > > > repeatedly how "this is a plain, ordinary deck" with which I
> am
> > > > > > > going to perform this trick.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not if the person is in fact dedicated to truth, unlike the
> > > > > > magician. Curtis isn't, you aren't (as I just got done
> noting),
> > > > > > Barry obviously isn't. So it isn't at all surprising that the
> > > > > > three of you would be anxious to portray a truth-teller as
> > > > > > a deceiver, is it?
> > > >
> > > > Can I assume you're afraid to answer my question, Stevie?
> > > >
> > > > And that's you in a nutshell, isn't Judy.  You can
> > > > > fill in the blank, (as you do),
> > > >
> > > > Which blank would this be, Stevie?
> > > >
> > > >  with whomever you determine to be the
> > > > > liar of the hour, or the day.  Usually there is no shortage of
> > > > > candidates.
> > > >
> > > > Actually they don't change much from week to week, Stevie.
> > > >
> > > > > And that, pretty much is how you spend your posts here.
> > > >
> > > > And that what, Stevie? Your writing is pretty incoherent
> > > > tonight. I don't think you quite got what I've been saying.
> > > >
> > > > But it's obvious you aren't happy about the truths I've
> > > > been telling, Stevie--you know, like the one about your
> > > > having blamed DrD for bringing up Barry's brother's
> > > > suicide when it was actually Barry who did that. And
> > > > another truth is that you've never retracted your
> > > > accusation nor apologized to DrD for it.
> > > >
> > > > I'm truly sorry that it makes you so uncomfortable,
> > > > Stevie, but them's the breaks.
> > > >
> > > > > And I am glad you have something to aspire towards.  Perhaps
> someone
> > > > > here will take up your cause and make a nomination.
> > > > > I think it would make for a fascinating vetting process.
> > > > > And yikes.  Could it be that you could be a possible candidate
> for
> > > the
> > > > > two different awards that have shown up now.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, Stevie, you've already forgotten what I said in my
> > > > earlier post, and you've even quoted it below. See if
> > > > you can find it. A little practice exercise for you.
> > > >
> > > > > > > but this is how you choose to spend your life force, so I
> > > > > > > hope is gratifying for you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not being concerned about the truth, you probably aren't
> > > > > > aware that there are many people who have dedicated their
> > > > > > lives to the truth, sometimes even *sacrificed* their
> > > > > > lives to the truth. Truth and truth-telling have generally
> > > > > > been highly regarded throughout history, something to
> > > > > > strive for.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.ridenhour.org/prizes_truth_telling.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (I wouldn't consider myself to come close to deserving
> > > > > > such a prize because my efforts have been so limited.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But there are always those who can't see the importance of
> > > > > > truth, who find it inconvenient and annoying, not worth the
> > > > > > effort; and even those who believe truth just gets in the
> > > > > > way of their needs and desires and whims. And sometimes, of
> > > > > > course, such people are just cowards who *fear* the truth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27"
> > > steve.sundur@
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I wonder if anyone even reads those rebuttals. But I
> suppose
> > > > > > > > > they are gratifying to you.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Right, the point is to get the truth on the record.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I mean, for example, I certainly wouldn't expect you
> > > > > > > > to retract and apologize for accusing DrD of bringing
> > > > > > > > up Barry's brother's suicide when, as I pointed out in
> > > > > > > > one of those posts, it was actually Barry himself who
> > > > > > > > had done so.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But that error--blaming DrD for Barry's own behavior--
> > > > > > > > can't be allowed to stand unrefuted.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That's just the way it is in this world. Some people
> > > > > > > > care about the truth, and some don't. The former can't
> > > > > > > > force the latter to care, so they do the best they can
> > > > > > > > to ensure the truth is not obscured by those who don't
> > > > > > > > care about it.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to