Take a look at the post of raunchy's Share cites and then take a moment to evaluate Share's integrity in what she says here about raunchy.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Irony Klunker IK from Raunchy pontificating about verbal abuse yet being the > woman who posted the most hard porn item on FFL about others. But maybe she > doesn't think hard porn is verbal abuse, especially when it's done in kind of > a sneaky, indirect way.* In any case, certainly a major inner disconnect for > a grandmother IMO. What's that? We shouldn't continue to judge her for > something she did in the past? Plonk! > > * post #326688 > > > ________________________________ > From: raunchydog <raunchydog@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 11:52 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share > > > > Â > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > > On 7/12/13 4:08 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > Dear Share - I think this is a brilliant move. This new strategy is > > > the right way to avoid Judy's perverse, obsessive, pathological need > > > to stick to facts, stick to truth. Clearly she lacks emotional > > > Don't confuse Share with the facts. Her mind is already made up. She sees > things from her reality only. There in no room for reality in a discussion > with her. Your point of view has no value despite the facts. It's a coping > behavior that attempts to control the outcome of a dispute in relationships. > Too bad she hasn't figured out that attacking the messenger and piling on > more layers of bullshit to confuse the issue is a piss poor strategy on a > public forum. > http://youtu.be/amcDIPQ5z5E >
