Emily, must you pick on turq so?!
________________________________ From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.r...@yahoo.com> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:12 AM Subject: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods She looks at him like a "brother"? Smile. They *are* similar in certain ways. ________________________________ From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" <authfri...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:59 AM Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods Emily observed with her usual sagacity: It's not Share's fault that she doesn't understand the conceptual difference between the two - she has never tried to have a "discussion." Good point. One would think, however, that even she would know better by now than to follow Barry's "get Judy" leads, but it's just hard--for me, at least--to fathom the depths of her cluelessness. ________________________________ From: Share Long <sharelong60@...> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:51 AM Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different strokes for different folks. ________________________________ From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: >> >> >>turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. >>But I don't think of that as lying. >> >> >>I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and >>say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a >>liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat >>any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after >>deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for >>having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake... >> >> >> >> >> >> >>________________________________ >> From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM >>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods >> >> >> >> >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either >>>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE >>>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a >>>> convoluted way that he's dishonest. >>> >>>All while having a discussion with the person >>>she claimed only yesterday she was never going >>>to discuss *anything* with until he either >>>documented something or retracted it. He >>>did neither. >>> >>>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle. >>> >>> >> >>