Dear Share, re: "Best simply to ride the wave and let it pass."  

You inserted yourself into the conversation between Xeno and Judy and made 
multiple (count the number, Share) posts to Judy demonstrating that you woke up 
on the wrong side of the bed (you might consider asking Barry to stop stealing 
the covers - perhaps you aren't getting enough sleep at night?).  Is *your* 
behavior, initiated by *you,* demonstrating what you state above?  



________________________________
 From: Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
At a certain point on Monday morning, Xeno and Judy both seemed more light 
hearted about it and that is what I was enjoying. Nothing sadistic about that 
IMO. And I have noticed that these arguments do come and go on a regular basis. 
Best to simply ride the wave and let it pass.




________________________________
 From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com" <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:08 PM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


It's not Share's fault that she doesn't understand the conceptual difference 
between the two - she has never tried to have a "discussion."  

I think Share (hi Share) is having a lot of fun with this and to me there is 
nothing that "fun" about it. She seems to be acting like it is not only a joke 
but is taking pleasure in the discord and adding to it in only the way she can. 
Barry is doing the usual which is to apparently not close his eyes to even 
sleep while there is a chance to "get" Judy and keep adding imaginary fuel to 
the fire. Xeno quoting Shakespeare is a small reprieve however. But I am 
sensing a tad bit of sadism in our dormouse, which I had not seen before. The 
fact that our alleged 'victim' of PR is "having fun" right now is revelatory.


________________________________
 From: Share Long <sharelong60@...>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on 
what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different 
strokes for different folks. 




________________________________
 From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. 
>>But I don't think of that as lying.
>>
>>
>>I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and 
>>say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a 
>>liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat 
>>any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after 
>>deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for 
>>having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM
>>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
>> 
>>
>>
>>  
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
>>>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
>>>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
>>>> convoluted way that he's dishonest.
>>>
>>>All while having a discussion with the person
>>>she claimed only yesterday she was never going
>>>to discuss *anything* with until he either 
>>>documented something or retracted it. He
>>>did neither.
>>>
>>>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>






 

Reply via email to