Most humans don't even know what enlightenment is. Just look at FFL.
Now for bots artificial enlightenment would be no electronic excitation
just silence. If they like it then they'll just sit there doing
nothing. Problem with robots taking over solved.
On 07/20/2015 12:04 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Salyavin,
Now everyone here would like to know if you are enlightened currently
or is it possible to regress once the apex of human life has been
attained?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :
Enlightenment is nothing. These mutha's are going to want the vote!
Right for ROBOTS? Act now to regulate KILLER MACHINES
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3168081/Should-robots-human-rights-Act-regulate-killer-machines-multiply-demand-right-vote-warns-legal-expert.html>
image
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3168081/Should-robots-human-rights-Act-regulate-killer-machines-multiply-demand-right-vote-warns-legal-expert.html>
Right for ROBOTS? Act now to regulate KILLER MACH...
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3168081/Should-robots-human-rights-Act-regulate-killer-machines-multiply-demand-right-vote-warns-legal-expert.html>
Ryan Calo, from the University of Washington’s School of Law warns
that our laws will have to adapt to robotics and artificial
intelligence or be faced with dif...
View on www.dailymail.co.uk
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3168081/Should-robots-human-rights-Act-regulate-killer-machines-multiply-demand-right-vote-warns-legal-expert.html>
Preview by Yahoo
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote :
Salyavin,
Believing is the initial cognition of a Divine Being after
experiencing all of the information from the world through the five
senses. Knowing a Divine Being is the stage of believing in which the
mind is convinced of Its existence through the information from the
senses. Enlightenment occurs when the mind and It are one and coexist
in the body as it lives in the world.
Convinced is a worrying word for me in this instance, labeling
experiences as some sort of "other" is making unwarranted assumptions.
I could call it all-round superniceness and it would be the same
thing, it's us who call it divine and thus dump our needy baggage all
over it.
An artificial machine cannot experience the Divine as the human body
can. Therefore, it cannot believe nor experience enlightenment.
How do you know? If we build a machine that mimics ourselves
perfectly, who are we to say that it can't have joyous experiences.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :
Hi salyavin, it's neither knowing nor believing. It's experiencing and
then interpreting or labeling. I bet "believing" happens in its very
own section of the brain. (-:
*From:* salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Monday, July 20, 2015 7:14 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Can Artificial Enlightenment Exist?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote :
IMO, I don't believe artificial intelligence can know God. Knowing
God requires a biological base, with a complicated connections of
nerve cells in the brain and a body structure made of bones, flesh and
blood.
"Know" god? Don't we mean "believe"? I'm sure a computer could acquire
beliefs about where it came from, probably worship it's creator, at
least they won't be in error about who that is!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emptybill@...> wrote :
This article is full of inaccurate generalities about Buddhism and
shows ignorance about the foundations of the varied darshana-s of the
Indian subcontinent. Since most current Euro-American "thinkers" who
consider consciousness and AI are philosophical amateurs, this article
is a display of truncated post-empirical/analytic musings.
How about this question instead?
Can an artificial intelligence know God?
This is an equivalent counter-question, which means it is a panapoly
of foolish assumptions posing as intelligent inquiry.
