This reification of a concept of
some 'nature' is a fallacy.
After enlightenment, there is not much ownership, it is just easier
__._,_.___
to do what nature wants because it is easiest to support nature, and in turn nature supports us. I know it sounds crazy, but it is simply the way it is. So intention exists, and desires exist and dedicated thought and action exist, but supported by nature. It is just easier. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' Kirk
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' jim_flanegin
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' curtisdeltablues
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' TurquoiseB
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field... curtisdeltablues
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' Kirk
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' Kirk
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' jim_flanegin
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' Kirk
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' jim_flanegin
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Clarifying The Energy Field' curtisdeltablues