Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Would it matter if Maharishi wasn't enlightened?

[Rick Archer]

Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Would it matter if Maharishi wasn't enlightened?





on 8/28/06 8:57 PM, rmy108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> If Guru Dev told Maharishi not to teach, why would Satyanand have 
> joined Maharishi, knowing full well that the whole TM movement was 
> against his masters wishes.   Its one thing if Maharishi disobeyed 
> Guru Dev, but its another thing that two disciples (MMY and 
> Satyanand) would disobey Guru Dev's instructions.  It doesn't make 
> sense to me that this could happen and therefore seems to take away 
> from the credibility of this idea that has been floating around that 
> Guru Dev told Maharishi not to teach.

It took a while for MMY to convince Satyanand to join him. Sat. wasn’t convinced at first that MMY was representing GD.


__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___