On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:35 AM, authfriend wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:53 AM, authfriend wrote: >> >>> It shouldn't even need to be remarked that >>> "psychiatrists who have worked with TM people" >>> have been exposed only, or primarily, to TM >>> people *with pathology* of some sort. Unless >>> these psychiatrists are able to be heroically >>> objective, they're naturally going to associate >>> TM with pathology simply because those are the >>> TMers they see professionally. >> >> Right, Judy, and if a shrink sees someone who happens to be >> a banker, lawyer or hair dresser, he or she is automatically >> going to associate those professions with pathology also. >> Makes perfect sense. > > <snore> > > Bogus analogy, Sal. But you knew that.
Um no it's not, Judy. But you knew that as well. Sal
