--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:35 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:53 AM, authfriend wrote: > >> > >>> It shouldn't even need to be remarked that > >>> "psychiatrists who have worked with TM people" > >>> have been exposed only, or primarily, to TM > >>> people *with pathology* of some sort. Unless > >>> these psychiatrists are able to be heroically > >>> objective, they're naturally going to associate > >>> TM with pathology simply because those are the > >>> TMers they see professionally. > >> > >> Right, Judy, and if a shrink sees someone who happens to be > >> a banker, lawyer or hair dresser, he or she is automatically > >> going to associate those professions with pathology also. > >> Makes perfect sense. > > > > <snore> > > > > Bogus analogy, Sal. But you knew that. > > Um no it's not, Judy. But you knew that as well.
Uh, yes it is, Sal, and you know it as well as I do.
