--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote:
> >
> > What's interesting about this post is that Barry appears, 
> > out of all the main posters on this forum, to have the 
> > biggest ego of all of them. He celebrates his ego [self] 
> > in his posts - and appears to have all of the skills 
> > required to hide the terrors of non-existence he describes. 
> > The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
> 
> I'll answer this, even though it's a bit of a slam,
> because it opens the possibility for a discussion
> that I don't think I've seen here before.
> 
> It's related to comments I made about love vs. lust
> recently. It's clearly possible to be as *attached*
> to love as it is to lust. And in many spiritual
> traditions, it's the *attachment* that's the boogey-
> man in the equation, not the activity itself. 
> 
> So is it the *having* an ego that's the boogeyman
> in the realization-of-Self game, or is it the 
> *attachment* to one's ego that is the boogeyman?
> 
> I'm kinda of the opinion that it's the latter.
> 
> Do I have a big ego? You betcha. Do I *revel* in
> having a big ego? You betcha. Am I particularly
> *attached* to that ego? I don't think so, because
> I've had so *many* of them. I've watched them come
> and go for years now, ever since I met the Rama
> dude and sat with him in the desert and had my
> ego-at-the-time blown out of its socks and watched
> it die.
> 
> This is a rap that is *not* gonna resonate with
> a lot of people here. Unless you have been in a 
> situation in which your ego -- your small s self --
> gets blown away and replaced with a *new* ego
> on a regular basis, what's to identify with?
> 
> But that's been my experience. So shoot me. :-)
> 
> We'd go out into the desert with Rama as one ego,
> and come back for a few days blown out of our
> socks, egoless. It would take a day or two for
> a new one to take hold. The same thing would 
> happen at the weekly meetings; it was to a large 
> extent what we were there for...those periods of 
> "between-ness" in which the old ego has been blown 
> away and a new one hasn't yet taken root.
> 
> For those of you who can admit to having dropped
> acid, and assuming you actually did *good* acid,
> try to remember back to that experience. There
> was a *reason* that Tiny Tim stole the basis for
> his book "The Psychedelic Experience" from the
> "Tibetan Book of the Dead." A good hit of pure
> Sandoz was literally like traversing the Bardo.
> You entered into the experience with a self, and
> the experience pointed out to you in no uncertain
> terms that you didn't really have one, and that
> Self was all there was. And for a few hours after
> the LSD experience, you remained in this "between-
> ness" state, with the old self blown away, but
> without having a new one (or, horrors, what you
> considered the "old" one) taking root again.
> 
> That's very similar to what I'm talking about,
> but without the reliance on chemicals.
> 
> I got *used* to this process of having one's ego
> blown out of its socks and, a day or so later,
> having a new one replace it. It happened on pretty
> much a weekly basis -- if not more often -- for
> fourteen years. 
> 
> THAT is to some extent where I'm "coming from"
> when I celebrate the latest and greatest ego or
> self I'm wearing. I don't *resent* the small s
> selves that play across my Self. I don't confuse
> them *with* Self. They are what they are, mere
> masks, costumes that Self has chosen to put on for
> some reason that probably even it doesn't understand, 
> long enough to make a nice entrance at some costume 
> ball. After the ball is over, the costume goes into 
> the trash bin and the Self "puts on" another self.
> 
> The new one is no more important than the old one.
> It has no more, and no less "going for it" than the 
> last self did. It's Just Another self.
> 
> So do I have an ego, a small s self? You betcha. 
> But, unlike many here, do I *resent* that small
> s self and view it as some kind of barrier to Self,
> something that I have to "overcome" or "get past?"
> No I do not. My personal experience has taught me
> that that's going to happen pretty soon without
> my having to do much to "make" it happen.
> 
> You guys are free to interpret all of this however
> you want. What you think about this rap, or my
> raps on this forum in general, doesn't really affect
> me that much. I've only met one person here in real
> life; the rest of you are just dots of phosphor.
> 
> I live my life the way I live it. End of story.
> Part of the way I have chosen to live it is to *not*
> fall into the rut (as I perceive it) of resenting
> the self or believing that it's a terrible obstacle
> to Self. I have had enough extended experiences of
> Self to know that that's not true. So I choose to
> have *fun* with the ego, rather than resenting it
> or pretending not to have one. OF COURSE I have
> one; so do you. And, in my opinion, having exper-
> ienced enlightenment for short periods of time, so 
> do the enlightened. Having an ego during those 
> periods of enlightenment did *not* prevent my
> realization of enlightenment. 
> 
> I'm *comfortable* with my ego. I'm comfortable cele-
> brating it, and even more comfortable laughing at its
> silliness. If you knew me personally, you'd have more
> of a feeling for the full *extent* of that silliness.
> I can laugh at each silly ego because I know it's not 
> going to be around that long. Tomorrow morning I'm 
> likely to wake up and have a whole new ego to laugh 
> at, and with. What is not to like about all that?


Barry's ego puts on a show of pretending that it has a handle on itself. 





Reply via email to