Yes, fixing this assertion error in one of the unit tests on one of the
buildbots:

http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-wheezy-amd64/builds/1707/steps/make%20run_unittests_py/logs/stdio

        num_iter = solver.solve(x, b)
>       assert num_iter == num_iter_ref
E       assert 27 == 6

Looks like a very peculiar test to me.



mån 27 juli 2015 kl 11:53 skrev Jan Blechta <blec...@karlin.mff.cuni.cz>:

> I've got rid of the last forgotten issue targeted to 1.6. Are we
> waiting for something else?
>
> Jan
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:26:33 +0100
> "Garth N. Wells" <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > I think we're ready now for the 1.6 release.
> >
> > Garth
> >
> > On 9 July 2015 at 22:54, Cian Wilson <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >  Done.  See:
> > > https://bitbucket.org/tferma/dolfin/branch/systemassemblerfix-master
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Cian
> > >
> > >
> > > On 07/08/2015 04:03 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 25 June 2015 at 21:20, Cian Wilson <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I still have a branch that fixes that and have been actively using
> > >> it since 1.5.0 came out.
> > >>
> > >> Happy to bring it up to current master and take any advice on
> > >> cleaner fixes if that would help.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >  It would be a big help if you could bring your branch up-to-date
> > > with master. Thanks.
> > >
> > >  Garth
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Cian
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 06/25/2015 04:14 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 25 June 2015 at 19:36, Anders Logg <l...@chalmers.se> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> What is the status of the upcoming release? Which are the current
> > >>>> blockers?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  This one is a blocker:
> > >>>
> > >>>      https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/494
> > >>>
> > >>> Garth
> > >>>
> > >>>  --
> > >>>> Anders
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> fenics mailing list
> > >>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> > >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  _______________________________________________
> > >>> fenics mailing list
> > >>> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> > >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> fenics mailing list
> > >> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
fenics@fenicsproject.org
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to