On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:55:46 +0000
Johannes Ring <joha...@simula.no> wrote:

> Ok, I can make the release tomorrow if the buildbot is green (I will

Buildbot is green. If nobody touches it until tomorrow.

Jan

> ignore the error on wheezy-amd64 with the old PETSc version). I'm not
> sure if I will have enough time to finish the binary packages,
> because I am continuing my vacation on Wednesday, but I can at least
> generate the tarballs and update the repositories tomorrow. Let me
> know if you think I should wait until after my vacation (I will be
> back in the middle of August).
> 
> Johannes
> 
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:00 PM Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > ok, I didn't look closely enough. Just looked at the last piece.
> >
> > --
> > Anders
> >
> >
> > mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:58 skrev Johannes Ring <joha...@simula.no>:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>  On 27 July 2015 at 11:45, Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I mean it looks very specific and that the number of iterations
> >>>> is likely to change if there is an upstream improvement or
> >>>> regression to the preconditioner or if the logic of checking the
> >>>> convergence criterion is slightly modified.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>     The reference number of iterations is computed at the
> >>> beginning of the test (it's not hard-wired), so it's robust with
> >>> respect to all the above issues. The test failure is showing that
> >>> (a) the old version of PETSc has a bug, or (b) that DOLFIN is not
> >>> interfacing properly to an old version of PETSc. Neither case is
> >>> worth fixing.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > It is PETSc version 3.4.2 on that buildbot, so yes it is old.
> >>
> >>  Johannes
> >>
> >>  Garth
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:42 skrev Garth N. Wells
> >>>> <gn...@cam.ac.uk>:
> >>>>
> >>>>>  On 27 July 2015 at 11:37, Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, fixing this assertion error in one of the unit tests on
> >>>>>> one of the buildbots:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-wheezy-amd64/builds/1707/steps/make%20run_unittests_py/logs/stdio
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>         num_iter = solver.solve(x, b)
> >>>>>> >       assert num_iter == num_iter_ref
> >>>>>> E       assert 27 == 6
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Looks like a very peculiar test to me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>     What's peculiar about it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  The problem is almost certainly an old version of PETSc on the
> >>>>> buildbot. The test could be disabled for old versions of PETSc.
> >>>>> This might request adding a function that returns the PETSc
> >>>>> version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Garth
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  mån 27 juli 2015 kl 11:53 skrev Jan Blechta <
> >>>>>> blec...@karlin.mff.cuni.cz>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've got rid of the last forgotten issue targeted to 1.6. Are
> >>>>>>> we waiting for something else?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:26:33 +0100
> >>>>>>>  "Garth N. Wells" <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > I think we're ready now for the 1.6 release.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > Garth
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > On 9 July 2015 at 22:54, Cian Wilson
> >>>>>>> > <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote:
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > >  Done.  See:
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/tferma/dolfin/branch/systemassemblerfix-master
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > Cheers,
> >>>>>>> > > Cian
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > On 07/08/2015 04:03 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > On 25 June 2015 at 21:20, Cian Wilson
> >>>>>>> > > <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >> I still have a branch that fixes that and have been
> >>>>>>> > >> actively
> >>>>>>> using
> >>>>>>> > >> it since 1.5.0 came out.
> >>>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > >> Happy to bring it up to current master and take any
> >>>>>>> > >> advice on cleaner fixes if that would help.
> >>>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > >  It would be a big help if you could bring your branch
> >>>>>>> > > up-to-date with master. Thanks.
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >  Garth
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> > >> Cian
> >>>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > >> On 06/25/2015 04:14 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > >>> On 25 June 2015 at 19:36, Anders Logg <l...@chalmers.se>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > >>>> What is the status of the upcoming release? Which are
> >>>>>>> > >>>> the
> >>>>>>> current
> >>>>>>> > >>>> blockers?
> >>>>>>> > >>>>
> >>>>>>> > >>>>  This one is a blocker:
> >>>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > >>>      https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/494
> >>>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > >>> Garth
> >>>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > >>>  --
> >>>>>>> > >>>> Anders
> >>>>>>> > >>>>
> >>>>>>> > >>>>
> >>>>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> > >>>> fenics mailing list
> >>>>>>> > >>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> >>>>>>> > >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> >>>>>>> > >>>>
> >>>>>>> > >>>>  _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> > >>> fenics mailing list
> >>>>>>> > >>> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> >>>>>>> > >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> >>>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> > >> fenics mailing list
> >>>>>>> > >> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> >>>>>>> > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> >>>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> fenics mailing list
> >>>>>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> >>>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>       _______________________________________________
> >>> fenics mailing list
> >>> fenics@fenicsproject.org
> >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> >>>
> >>

_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
fenics@fenicsproject.org
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to