ok, I didn't look closely enough. Just looked at the last piece. -- Anders
mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:58 skrev Johannes Ring <joha...@simula.no>: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On 27 July 2015 at 11:45, Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I mean it looks very specific and that the number of iterations is >>> likely to change if there is an upstream improvement or regression to the >>> preconditioner or if the logic of checking the convergence criterion is >>> slightly modified. >>> >>> >> The reference number of iterations is computed at the beginning of >> the test (it's not hard-wired), so it's robust with respect to all the >> above issues. The test failure is showing that (a) the old version of PETSc >> has a bug, or (b) that DOLFIN is not interfacing properly to an old version >> of PETSc. Neither case is worth fixing. >> > > It is PETSc version 3.4.2 on that buildbot, so yes it is old. > > Johannes > > Garth >> >> >> >>> >>> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:42 skrev Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk>: >>> >>>> On 27 July 2015 at 11:37, Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, fixing this assertion error in one of the unit tests on one of >>>>> the buildbots: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-wheezy-amd64/builds/1707/steps/make%20run_unittests_py/logs/stdio >>>>> >>>>> num_iter = solver.solve(x, b) >>>>> > assert num_iter == num_iter_ref >>>>> E assert 27 == 6 >>>>> >>>>> Looks like a very peculiar test to me. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> What's peculiar about it? >>>> >>>> The problem is almost certainly an old version of PETSc on the >>>> buildbot. The test could be disabled for old versions of PETSc. This might >>>> request adding a function that returns the PETSc version. >>>> >>>> Garth >>>> >>>>> >>>>> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 11:53 skrev Jan Blechta < >>>>> blec...@karlin.mff.cuni.cz>: >>>>> >>>>>> I've got rid of the last forgotten issue targeted to 1.6. Are we >>>>>> waiting for something else? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:26:33 +0100 >>>>>> "Garth N. Wells" <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > I think we're ready now for the 1.6 release. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Garth >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On 9 July 2015 at 22:54, Cian Wilson <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > Done. See: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/tferma/dolfin/branch/systemassemblerfix-master >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Cheers, >>>>>> > > Cian >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > On 07/08/2015 04:03 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > On 25 June 2015 at 21:20, Cian Wilson <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu> >>>>>> > > wrote: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >> I still have a branch that fixes that and have been actively >>>>>> using >>>>>> > >> it since 1.5.0 came out. >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Happy to bring it up to current master and take any advice on >>>>>> > >> cleaner fixes if that would help. >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > > It would be a big help if you could bring your branch up-to-date >>>>>> > > with master. Thanks. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Garth >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >> Cheers, >>>>>> > >> Cian >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> On 06/25/2015 04:14 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >>> On 25 June 2015 at 19:36, Anders Logg <l...@chalmers.se> wrote: >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>>> What is the status of the upcoming release? Which are the >>>>>> current >>>>>> > >>>> blockers? >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> This one is a blocker: >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/494 >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>> Garth >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>> -- >>>>>> > >>>> Anders >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > >>>> fenics mailing list >>>>>> > >>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>>> > >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > >>> fenics mailing list >>>>>> > >>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>>> > >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > >> fenics mailing list >>>>>> > >> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>>> > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> fenics mailing list >>>>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> fenics mailing list >> fenics@fenicsproject.org >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >> >
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list fenics@fenicsproject.org http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
